On a Sunday afternoon in 1996, a solitary shooter using powerful firearms killed 35 people in the historic site of Port Arthur.
That national tragedy nearly a generation ago, which ushered in some of the most stringent gun laws in the world, can feel like a bygone age for many Australians.
However, the tragedy in Bondi this past Sunday, which resulted in 15 fatalities, has revived the ghosts of the 1996 shootings.
A study released earlier this year revealed that there are now more than four million weapons owned by civilians across the country – a figure that is roughly two times the amount from two decades prior.
This equates to approximately one gun for every seven Australians.
While the state of Queensland has the most registered guns, followed by New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, it is Tasmania and the Northern Territory that have the highest rate of firearm ownership.
The data also challenges the common view that guns are mostly possessed by rural residents.
Weapons are common in metropolitan and suburban areas, with a sizable percentage located in population centres.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the average licence holder possessing over four firearms.
Weapons legislation in Australia are not uniform across the country, with a mixed implementation of rules in various regions.
Broadly speaking, to secure a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "suitable candidate", pass a training and safety course, and provide a "legitimate need" for ownership.
The permitted justifications include recreational hunting or pest control, marksmanship, certain professional duties, and as a hobby.
However, significant shortcomings remain. For instance, minors in some jurisdictions can have use of a firearm from as young as early adolescence.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a major rewrite of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a large-scale surrender scheme of over 650,000 firearms.
Certain types of firearms were banned, and security screenings alongside waiting periods for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the elimination of "self-defence" as a valid reason for gun ownership.
In the hours following the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to bolster gun laws.
A national gun buyback scheme was announced, marking the most significant such effort since 1996.
Other proposals now under consideration include:
There are also calls for periodic reassessments of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "situations evolve" over time.
These proposed changes have met with opposition from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates maintain that imposing caps would not have prevented an attack driven by radicalisation.
They suggest that focus would be better spent combating radicalisation rather than tightening regulations for the vast majority of responsible owners.
Furthermore, a critical reform from 1996 – a country-wide gun database – remains not yet operational, though it has now been listed as a priority.
For long-time advocates, the Bondi attack is a stark warning that gun laws must evolve with changing times.
They argue that strengthening is needed to "keep up-to-date" and prevent future tragedies.
While mass shootings remain infrequent in Australia compared to some nations, the risk persists, and the legacy of weapons being misused – through theft – continues to pose a danger.
As one advocate reflected, "It's sad that it requires such a tragedy to get people to wake up and take notice."
Elena Vance is a seasoned journalist and tech enthusiast, known for her insightful analysis and engaging storytelling across various media platforms.